Skip to main content

Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health: Endnotes

Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health
Endnotes

  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources

  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeFoundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Acknowledgements
  3. About the Authors
    1. Astrid Brousselle
    2. Kai Mountfort
  4. Invitation
  5. Prologue: The Hummingbird Fable
  6. Introduction
    1. Earth Day Evaluation Declaration 2024
    2. Endnotes
  7. 1. Context Matters: Evaluation in the 21st Century
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Environmental and Social Depletion
    4. Reducing Risks
    5. Local Cultural Contexts
    6. Evaluation Takes Place in a Political Context
    7. Post-truth Influence as the New Propaganda
    8. Conclusion
    9. Endnotes
  8. 2. Evaluation for Planetary Health
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    4. The Planetary Health Framework
    5. A Transformative Approach
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  9. 3. The Planetary Health Rapid Impact Assessment Tool
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The Planetary Health Rapid Impact Assessment Tool
    4. Conclusion
    5. Endnotes
  10. 4. Evaluation: Definitions, Approaches and Questions
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Definitions
    4. Evaluation Approaches
    5. When to Evaluate and for What Purpose?
    6. Evaluative Questions
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  11. 5. Preparing for the Evaluation
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Evaluation Use and the Importance of Mapping the Context
    4. Drafting an Evaluation Plan
    5. Summary
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  12. 6. Representing the Intervention
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The Causal Model
    4. The Logic Model
    5. Use of Logic Models
    6. Different Visual Representations of the Intervention
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  13. 7. Logic Analysis
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Foundations of Logic Analysis
    4. Types of Logic Analysis
    5. Steps for Conducting a Direct Logic Analysis
    6. Steps for Conducting a Reverse Logic Analysis
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  14. 8. Effect Analysis and Related Approaches
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Defining Effects and Causal Relationship
    4. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research Designs
    5. Contribution Analysis
    6. Impact Evaluation
    7. Considering Planetary Health Dimensions when Evaluating Impacts
    8. Outcome Harvesting
    9. Conclusion
    10. Endnotes
  15. 9. Implementation Analysis
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. In the Literature
    4. Implementation Analysis Questions
    5. Evaluation Designs for Implementation Analysis
    6. Impacts on Planetary Health
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  16. 10. Economic Evaluation
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Background
    4. Types of Economic Evaluations
    5. The Comparator
    6. Cost Calculation
    7. Time Horizon
    8. Uncertainty
    9. Decision Criteria
    10. Limitations of Existing Approaches
    11. A Proposal for Useful Economic Evaluations for Planetary Health
    12. Conclusion
    13. Endnotes
  17. 11. Needs Assessment
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Defining What is, What should be and For Whom
    4. Contextual Elements and Boundaries
    5. Ex-ante and Ex-post
    6. Other important Considerations
    7. Next Steps?
    8. A Political Exercise
    9. Summary
    10. Endnotes
  18. 12. Monitoring
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Focus
    4. Establishing a Monitoring System
    5. Reporting and Other Considerations
    6. Gaming and Other Behavioural Effects
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  19. 13. An Example: Evaluating a Local Government Official Community Plan Using Planetary Health Lenses
    1. Introduction
    2. Characterizing the OCP Within the Context of the Planetary Health Framework
    3. Data Collection
    4. Findings
    5. Recommendations
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  20. 14. Further Thoughts and Resources
    1. Endnotes
  21. Bibliography

Endnotes

Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. (1999). Accountability in Decentralization: A Framework with South Asian and West African Cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33(4), 295–312.

Arendt, H. (2005/1967). Truth and Politics. In Truth (pp. 295–314). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776407.ch19

Baier, G., & Brown, D. (2019). The environmental union. In H. Bakvis, D. M. Brown, G. Baier, & D. M. Brown (Eds.), Contested federalism : certainty and ambiguity in the Canadian federation (2nd edition ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. Kennikat Press.

Bowman, N. (2019). Nation-to-Nation Evaluation: Governance, Tribal Sovereignty, and Systems Thinking through Culturally Responsive Indigenous Evaluations. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation/Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.67977

Bowman, N., & Bremner, L. (2024). Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Applying It By, With, For, and Through Indigenous Evaluators and Evaluations. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation/Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme, 39(2), 265-287. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2024-0039

Brahms, Y. (2020). Philosophy of Post-Truth. Institute for National Security Studies. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep23537

Bremner, L. K., Johnston, A. L. K., G., R., Sasakamoose, J., & Evans, J. (2020). Exploring Indigenous Approaches to Evaluation and Research in the Context of Victim Services and Supports. Summary by Jane Evans. Papers Submitted to the Department of Justice Canada by Larry K. Bremner, Andrea L.K. Johnston, Gladys Rowe, JoLee Sasakamoose, Department of Justice Canada/ Ministère de la Justice Canada (last accessed online on Aug 20, 2024): https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/eiaer-eaame/docs/rsd_rr2020-indigenous-approaches-to-evaluation-and-research-eng.pdf.

Brousselle, A. (2024). Post-truth and pathways for evaluators. Evaluation, 30(4), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890241265859

Brousselle, A. (2025). Post-truth: what are the implications for evaluators? In J. A. Chouinard & S. Thiessen (Eds.), Transforming Public Administration in Canada. An exploration of Social Equity in Research, Practice and Teaching (pp. 93-106). Information Age Publishing.

Brousselle, A., Bremner, L., Parata, K., Hasan, A. A., Felcis, W., Belzer, A., Kedoté, M., Nanda, R., Rey, L., & Veira-da-Silva, L. M. (2024a). Foundations for a utopia in evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation/Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme, 39(2), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0026

Brousselle, A., Kennedy, C., & Brunet-Jailly, E. (2020). More crises to come: managing risk and fostering resilience with COVID-19 pandemic recovery. Canadian Public Administration/ Administration Publique du Canada, 63(3), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12388

Brousselle, A., & McDavid, J. (2020). Evaluators in the Anthropocene. Evaluation, 26(2), 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020911060

Brousselle, A., & McDavid, J. (2021). Evaluation for Planetary Health. Evaluation, 27(2), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020952462

CAPP. (2021). Indigenous Engagement and ESG Report. https://www.capp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Indigenous-Engagement-and-ESG-Report-397763.pdf

Chilisa, B., & Mertens, D. M. (2021). Indigenous Made in Africa Evaluation Frameworks: Addressing Epistemic Violence and Contributing to Social Transformation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 42(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020948601

Chouinard, J. A., & Cram, F. (2020). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation : empirical implications for theory and practice. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506368559

Contandriopoulos, D., & Brousselle, A. (2012). Evaluation Models and Evaluation Use. Evaluation, 18(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011430371

Cram, F. (2018a). Conclusion: Lessons About Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation (Vol. 159, pp. 121-133).

Cram, F. (2018b). Editors’ Notes: A Stepping Stone in Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation (pp. 7-16). New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20327

EvalIndigenous. (2024). Wolastoq Declaration on Indigenous Evaluation. https://www.evalindigenous.net/wolastoq-declaration.html

Fischer, F. (2021). Truth and post-truth in public policy : interpreting the arguments. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/truth-and-posttruth-in-public-policy/EF614DD10AF388DAE0ABB644539AF668

Fuller, R., Landrigan, P. J., Balakrishnan, K., Bathan, G., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Brauer, M., Caravanos, J., Chiles, T., Cohen, A., Corra, L., Cropper, M., Ferraro, G., Hanna, J., Hanrahan, D., Hu, H., Hunter, D., Janata, G., Kupka, R., Lanphear, B., . . . Yan, C. (2022). Pollution and health: a progress update. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(6), e535-e547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0

Gifford, R. (2011). The Dragons of Inaction: Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. The American Psychologist, 66(4), 290-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566

Gore, T., M., A., & A., R. (2020). Confronting Carbon Inequality. Putting Climate Justice at the Heart of COVID-19 Recovery (O. M. Briefing, Ed.) https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621052/mb-confronting-carbon-inequality-210920-en.pdf

Gorski, D., & Yamey, G. (2021). Covid-19 and the new merchants of doubt. The BMJ Opinion. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/09/13/covid-19-and-the-new-merchants-of-doubt/

Government of Canada. (2024). Consolidation. The Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/Const_TRD.pdf

Greve, B. (2012). Happiness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203234471

Hansen, J., Sato, M., Simons, L., & al., e. (2023). Global warming in the pipeline. Oxford Open Climate Change, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgad008

Hickel, J. (2017). The Divide. A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions. Penguin Random House.

House, E., & Howe, K. (1999). Values in Evaluation and Social Research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243252

House, E. R. (2020). Evaluating in a Fragmented Society. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 16(36), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i36.653

IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf

IPCC. (2022). Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf

Jarman, J. (2016). Motivated to Ingore the Facts. The Inability of Fact-Checking to Promote Truth in the Public Sphere. In J. Hannan (Ed.), Truth in the Public Sphere (pp. 179-200). Lexington Books.

Karanikolos, M., Mladovsky, P., & Cylus, J., et al. (2013). Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. The Lancet, 381(9874), 1323–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60102-6

Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13

Marquardt, J., & Lederer, M. (2022). Politicizing climate change in times of populism: an introduction. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 735-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2083478

Marquardt, J., Oliveira, C. M., & Lederer, M. (2022). Same, same but different? How democratically elected right-wing populists shape climate change policymaking. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 777-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2053423

McCulloch, M. T., Winter, A., Sherman, C. E., & Trotter, J. A. (2024). 300 years of sclerosponge thermometry shows global warming has exceeded 1.5 °C. Nature Climate Change, 14, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01919-7

McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.

McNeil, K. (n.d.). A Brief History of Our Right to Self-Governance. Pre-Contact to Present. https://fngovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Right-to-Self-Governance-2022_v2.pdf

Nesmith, A. A., Schmitz, C. L., Machado-Escudero, Y., Billiot, S., Forbes, R. A., Powers, M. C. F., Buckhoy, N., & Lawrence, L. A. (2021). The Intersection of Environmental Justice, Climate Change, Community, and the Ecology of Life. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55951-9

Ostrom, E. (2007). Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems: An Impossibility? Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being, Annual Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, February 15–19, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Poulakidakos, S., Veneti, A., & Frangonikolopoulos, C. (2018). Post-truth, propaganda and the transformation of the spiral of silence. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.14.3.367_1

Rowe, G. (2022). In Indigenous Insights: An Evaluation Podcast. Indigenous evaluation conversations.

Rowe, G. (2024a). Indigenous Insights: An Evaluation Podcast. Indigenous evaluation conversations In S03E03: Environmental Stewardship and Community-Led Stewardship with Heather Burke and Cheyenne Williams.

Rowe, G. (2024b). Indigenous Insights: An Evaluation Podcast. Indigenous evaluation conversations In S03E07: Transforming Indigenous Research and Evaluation with An Garagiola.

Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. McGraw-Hill.

Stuckler, D., & Basu, S. (2013). The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills. Basic Books.

Stuckler, D., Basu, S., Suhrcke, M., & al., e. (2009). The public health effect of economic crises and alternative policy responses in Europe: An empirical analysis. . The Lancet, 374(9686), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61124-7

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future. Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. https://caid.ca/TRCFinExeSum2015.pdf

United Nations. (2007). Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf

van den Berg, R., Bours, D., Brousselle, A., Čekan, J., Chaplowe, S., Chelimsky, E., Davies, I., Felcis, W., Leiter, T., Menezes, D., Picciotto, R., Rogers, P., Rowe, A., & Uitto, J. (2022). What should evaluation learn from COP 26? Views of evaluation practitioners. Evaluation, 28(1), 7-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890221074173

Wahl, D. C. (2016). Designing Regenerative Cultures. Triarchy Press.

Weiss, C. (1973/1993). Where Politics and Evaluation Research Meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409301400119

Whyte, K. (2019). Too late for indigenous climate justice: Ecological and relational tipping points, WIREs Climate Change https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.603

World Health Organization. (2019). Healthy prosperous lives for all: the European health equity status report. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/326879

World Wild Fund for Nature. (2022). The living Planet Report 2022. World Wild Fund for Nature. Retrieved July 26, 2023 from https://livingplanet.panda.org

Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983747

Annotate

Next Chapter
2. Evaluation for Planetary Health
PreviousNext
EPUB
This book is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This means that you are free to share and build upon the material, so long as you give appropriate credit and indicate if changes are made. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Under this license, anyone who redistributes or modifies this book, in whole or in part, can do so for free providing they properly attribute the book as follows: Brousselle, A. (2026). Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health. Victoria, B.C. University of Victoria Libraries. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18357/9781550587364
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org