Skip to main content

Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health: Endnotes

Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health
Endnotes

  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources

  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeFoundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Acknowledgements
  3. About the Authors
    1. Astrid Brousselle
    2. Kai Mountfort
  4. Invitation
  5. Prologue: The Hummingbird Fable
  6. Introduction
    1. Earth Day Evaluation Declaration 2024
    2. Endnotes
  7. 1. Context Matters: Evaluation in the 21st Century
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Environmental and Social Depletion
    4. Reducing Risks
    5. Local Cultural Contexts
    6. Evaluation Takes Place in a Political Context
    7. Post-truth Influence as the New Propaganda
    8. Conclusion
    9. Endnotes
  8. 2. Evaluation for Planetary Health
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    4. The Planetary Health Framework
    5. A Transformative Approach
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  9. 3. The Planetary Health Rapid Impact Assessment Tool
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The Planetary Health Rapid Impact Assessment Tool
    4. Conclusion
    5. Endnotes
  10. 4. Evaluation: Definitions, Approaches and Questions
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Definitions
    4. Evaluation Approaches
    5. When to Evaluate and for What Purpose?
    6. Evaluative Questions
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  11. 5. Preparing for the Evaluation
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Evaluation Use and the Importance of Mapping the Context
    4. Drafting an Evaluation Plan
    5. Summary
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  12. 6. Representing the Intervention
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The Causal Model
    4. The Logic Model
    5. Use of Logic Models
    6. Different Visual Representations of the Intervention
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  13. 7. Logic Analysis
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Foundations of Logic Analysis
    4. Types of Logic Analysis
    5. Steps for Conducting a Direct Logic Analysis
    6. Steps for Conducting a Reverse Logic Analysis
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  14. 8. Effect Analysis and Related Approaches
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Defining Effects and Causal Relationship
    4. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research Designs
    5. Contribution Analysis
    6. Impact Evaluation
    7. Considering Planetary Health Dimensions when Evaluating Impacts
    8. Outcome Harvesting
    9. Conclusion
    10. Endnotes
  15. 9. Implementation Analysis
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. In the Literature
    4. Implementation Analysis Questions
    5. Evaluation Designs for Implementation Analysis
    6. Impacts on Planetary Health
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  16. 10. Economic Evaluation
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Background
    4. Types of Economic Evaluations
    5. The Comparator
    6. Cost Calculation
    7. Time Horizon
    8. Uncertainty
    9. Decision Criteria
    10. Limitations of Existing Approaches
    11. A Proposal for Useful Economic Evaluations for Planetary Health
    12. Conclusion
    13. Endnotes
  17. 11. Needs Assessment
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Defining What is, What should be and For Whom
    4. Contextual Elements and Boundaries
    5. Ex-ante and Ex-post
    6. Other important Considerations
    7. Next Steps?
    8. A Political Exercise
    9. Summary
    10. Endnotes
  18. 12. Monitoring
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Focus
    4. Establishing a Monitoring System
    5. Reporting and Other Considerations
    6. Gaming and Other Behavioural Effects
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  19. 13. An Example: Evaluating a Local Government Official Community Plan Using Planetary Health Lenses
    1. Introduction
    2. Characterizing the OCP Within the Context of the Planetary Health Framework
    3. Data Collection
    4. Findings
    5. Recommendations
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  20. 14. Further Thoughts and Resources
    1. Endnotes
  21. Bibliography

Endnotes

Brousselle, A. (2024). Post-truth and pathways for evaluators. Evaluation, 30(4), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890241265859

Brousselle, A., & McDavid, J. (2021). Evaluation for Planetary Health. Evaluation, 27(2), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020952462

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Atlanta, Georgia.

Chilisa, B., & Mertens, D. M. (2021). Indigenous Made in Africa Evaluation Frameworks: Addressing Epistemic Violence and Contributing to Social Transformation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 42(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020948601

Chouinard, J. A., & Cram, F. (2020). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation : empirical implications for theory and practice. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506368559

Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Ground theory after the postmodern turn. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985833

Contandriopoulos, D., & Brousselle, A. (2012). Evaluation Models and Evaluation Use. Evaluation, 18(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011430371

Cram, F. (2018a). Conclusion: Lessons About Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation (Vol. 159, pp. 121-133).

Cram, F. (2018b). Editors’ Notes: A Stepping Stone in Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation (pp. 7-16). New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20327

Evans, J., Bremner, L. K., Johnston, A. L. K., Rowe, G., & Sasakamoose, J. (2020). Exploring Indigenous Approaches to Evaluation and Research in the Context of Victim Services and Supports. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/eiaer-eaame/docs/rsd_rr2020-indigenous-approaches-to-evaluation-and-research-eng.pdf

Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial: on the social construction of alternative facts. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2019.1602067

Fischer, F. (2021). Truth and post-truth in public policy : interpreting the arguments. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/truth-and-posttruth-in-public-policy/EF614DD10AF388DAE0ABB644539AF668

Gorski, D., & Yamey, G. (2021). Covid-19 and the new merchants of doubt. The BMJ Opinion. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/09/13/covid-19-and-the-new-merchants-of-doubt/

Government of Canada. (2014). Chapter 9: Research involving the First Nations, Inuit and Métis People of Canada in the latest edition of Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/chapter9-chapitre9/

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). The coming of age of evaluation. In E. G. Guba & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Fourth Generation Evaluation (pp. 21-49). Sage Publications.

Klein, G. (2011). Critical thinking. Theoretical Issues Ergonomics Science, 12(3), 210–224.

Loseke, D. (2013). Methodological thinking: Basic principles of social research design. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802700

Montrosse-Moorhead, B., Bitar, K., Arévalo, J., & Rishko-Porcescu, A. (2019). Revolution in the making: Evaluation “done well” in the era of the SDGs with a Youth Participatory Approach. In R. van den Berg, C. Magro, & S. Salinas Mulder (Eds.), Evaluation for transformational change: Opportunities and challenges for the Sustainable Development Goals. International Development Evaluation Association (IDEAS).

Patton, M. (1988). The evaluator’s responsibility for utilization. American Journal of Evaluation, 9, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80059-X

Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation (3rd edition ed.). Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2012). Essential of Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (2018). A historical perspective on the evolution of evaluation thinking In A. T. Vo & T. Archibald (Eds.), Evaluative Thinking (Vol. 158, pp. 11-28). New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20325

Stern, E. (2015). Impact Evaluation. A Guide for Commissioners and Managers. https://www.bond.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/impact_evaluation_guide_0515.pdf

Paris Agreement, (2015). https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf

Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework., (2022). https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-15/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf

Weiss, C. (1988). If program decisions hinged only on information: a response to Patton. American Journal of Evaluation, 9(15), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80042-4

Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983747

Annotate

Next Chapter
6. Representing the Intervention
PreviousNext
EPUB
This book is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This means that you are free to share and build upon the material, so long as you give appropriate credit and indicate if changes are made. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Under this license, anyone who redistributes or modifies this book, in whole or in part, can do so for free providing they properly attribute the book as follows: Brousselle, A. (2026). Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health. Victoria, B.C. University of Victoria Libraries. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18357/9781550587364
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org