Skip to main content

Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health: Endnotes

Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health
Endnotes

  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources

  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeFoundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Acknowledgements
  3. About the Authors
    1. Astrid Brousselle
    2. Kai Mountfort
  4. Invitation
  5. Prologue: The Hummingbird Fable
  6. Introduction
    1. Earth Day Evaluation Declaration 2024
    2. Endnotes
  7. 1. Context Matters: Evaluation in the 21st Century
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Environmental and Social Depletion
    4. Reducing Risks
    5. Local Cultural Contexts
    6. Evaluation Takes Place in a Political Context
    7. Post-truth Influence as the New Propaganda
    8. Conclusion
    9. Endnotes
  8. 2. Evaluation for Planetary Health
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    4. The Planetary Health Framework
    5. A Transformative Approach
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  9. 3. The Planetary Health Rapid Impact Assessment Tool
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The Planetary Health Rapid Impact Assessment Tool
    4. Conclusion
    5. Endnotes
  10. 4. Evaluation: Definitions, Approaches and Questions
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Definitions
    4. Evaluation Approaches
    5. When to Evaluate and for What Purpose?
    6. Evaluative Questions
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  11. 5. Preparing for the Evaluation
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Evaluation Use and the Importance of Mapping the Context
    4. Drafting an Evaluation Plan
    5. Summary
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  12. 6. Representing the Intervention
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. The Causal Model
    4. The Logic Model
    5. Use of Logic Models
    6. Different Visual Representations of the Intervention
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  13. 7. Logic Analysis
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Foundations of Logic Analysis
    4. Types of Logic Analysis
    5. Steps for Conducting a Direct Logic Analysis
    6. Steps for Conducting a Reverse Logic Analysis
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  14. 8. Effect Analysis and Related Approaches
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Defining Effects and Causal Relationship
    4. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research Designs
    5. Contribution Analysis
    6. Impact Evaluation
    7. Considering Planetary Health Dimensions when Evaluating Impacts
    8. Outcome Harvesting
    9. Conclusion
    10. Endnotes
  15. 9. Implementation Analysis
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. In the Literature
    4. Implementation Analysis Questions
    5. Evaluation Designs for Implementation Analysis
    6. Impacts on Planetary Health
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  16. 10. Economic Evaluation
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Background
    4. Types of Economic Evaluations
    5. The Comparator
    6. Cost Calculation
    7. Time Horizon
    8. Uncertainty
    9. Decision Criteria
    10. Limitations of Existing Approaches
    11. A Proposal for Useful Economic Evaluations for Planetary Health
    12. Conclusion
    13. Endnotes
  17. 11. Needs Assessment
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Defining What is, What should be and For Whom
    4. Contextual Elements and Boundaries
    5. Ex-ante and Ex-post
    6. Other important Considerations
    7. Next Steps?
    8. A Political Exercise
    9. Summary
    10. Endnotes
  18. 12. Monitoring
    1. Highlights
    2. Introduction
    3. Focus
    4. Establishing a Monitoring System
    5. Reporting and Other Considerations
    6. Gaming and Other Behavioural Effects
    7. Conclusion
    8. Endnotes
  19. 13. An Example: Evaluating a Local Government Official Community Plan Using Planetary Health Lenses
    1. Introduction
    2. Characterizing the OCP Within the Context of the Planetary Health Framework
    3. Data Collection
    4. Findings
    5. Recommendations
    6. Conclusion
    7. Endnotes
  20. 14. Further Thoughts and Resources
    1. Endnotes
  21. Bibliography

Endnotes

Brousselle, A. (2004). What Counts is not Falling... but Landing: Strategic Analysis: An Adapted Model for Implementation Evaluation. Evaluation 10(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389004046292

Brousselle, A., & Buregeya, J.-M. (2018). Theory-based evaluations: Framing the existence of a new theory in evaluation and the rise of the 5th generation. Evaluation, 24(2), 153 –168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018765487

Brousselle, A., & Champagne, F. (2004). How was the UNAIDS drug access initiative implemented in Chile? Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.04.004

Brousselle, A., Champagne, F., & Contandriopoulos, A.-P. (2006). Vers une réconciliation des théories et de la pratique de l'évaluation, perspectives d'avenir. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 29(3), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.7202/1086394ar

Champagne, F., Brousselle, A., Hartz, Z., Contandriopoulos, A. P., & Denis, J. L. (2011b). L’analyse de l’implantation. In A. Brousselle, F. Champagne, A. P. Contandriopoulos, & Z. Hartz (Eds.), L’Évaluation: Concepts et Méthodes (pp. 237-273). Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.

Chen, H.-T. (2005). Practical Program Evaluation. Assessing and improving planning, implementation and effectiveness. Sage Publications.

Hewitt, G., Sims, S., & Harris, R. (2012). The realist approach to evaluation research: An introduction. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 19(5), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.5.250

Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., & al., e. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15, 725. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1

King, J. A., Lyons Morris, L., & Taylor Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1987). How to Assess Program Implementation. Sage Publications.

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349

Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001

Love, A. (2004). Implementation evaluation. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation. Jossey-Bass.

Mehdipanah, R., Manzano, A., Borrell, C., & al., e. (2015). Exploring complex causal pathways between urban renewal, health and health inequality using a theory-driven realist approach. Social Science & Medicine(124), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.050

Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation (3rd edition ed.). Sage Publications.

Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: The promise of ‘realist synthesis’. Evaluation, 8(3), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/135638902401462448

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. Sage.

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realist evaluation. Available at: www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf

Provus, M. (1971). Discrepancy Evaluation for Educationnal Program Improvement and Assessment. McCutchan.

Ranmuthugala, G., Cunningham, F. C., Plumb, J. J., & al., e. (2011). A realist evaluation of the role of communities of practice in changing healthcare practice. Implementation Science, 6(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-49

Ridde, V., Robert, É., Guichard, A., & al., e. (2012). L’approche réaliste à l’épreuve du réel de l’évaluation des programmes. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 26(3), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.0026.005

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. (2019). Evaluation : a Systematic Approach (8th edition ed.). Sage.

Salter, K., & Kothari, A. (2014). Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: A state-of-the-art review. Implementation Science, 9(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0115-y

Saunders, R. P., Evans, M. H., & Joshi, P. (2005). Developing a Process-Evaluation Plan for Assessing Health Promotion Program Implementation: A How-To Guide. Health Promotion Practice, 6(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839904273387

Scheirer, M. A. (1994). Designing and Using Process Evaluations. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 40-68). Jossey-Bass.

Scheirer, M. A., Shediac, M. C., & Cassady, C. E. (1995). Measuring the implementationof health promotion programs: The case of the breast and cervical-cancer program in Maryland. Health Education Research, 10(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/10.1.11

Viadro, C., Earp, J. A. L., & Altpeter, M. (1997). Designing a process evaluation for a comprehensive breast cancer screening intervention: Challenges and opportunities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00001-3

Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation. Second Edition. Prentice Hall.

Zapka, J., Goins, K. V., Pbert, L., & Ockene, J. K. (2004). Translating efficacy research to effectiveness studies in practice: Lessons from research to promote smoking cessation in community health care centers. Health Promotion Practice, 5(3), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839904263713

Annotate

Next Chapter
10. Economic Evaluation
PreviousNext
EPUB
This book is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This means that you are free to share and build upon the material, so long as you give appropriate credit and indicate if changes are made. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Under this license, anyone who redistributes or modifies this book, in whole or in part, can do so for free providing they properly attribute the book as follows: Brousselle, A. (2026). Foundations of Evaluation for Planetary Health. Victoria, B.C. University of Victoria Libraries. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18357/9781550587364
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org