List of Tables and Figures | Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach

List of Tables and Figures

Tables

Table 2.1 Attributes of CIS Success Factors
Table 2.2 Attributes of Contingent Factors
Table 2.3 Summary of 14 Systematic Review Articles on HIS Field Evaluation Studies
Table 2.4 Summary of BE Measures
Table 2.5 Examples of Canadian Evaluation Studies where the BE Framework was Applied
Table 2.6 eHealth Evaluation in Other Countries where the BE Framework was Mentioned
Table 2.7 Canadian Evaluation Studies where the S&U Assessment Survey Tool was Applied
Table 3.1 Canadian Evaluation Studies where the CA Framework was Applied
Table 6.1 Criteria Pool
Table 7.1 Summary of Adoption Factors that Influence eHealth Values
from Canadian Studies
Table 9.1 Typology of Literature Reviews (adapted from Paré et al., 2015)
Table 10.1 Sample Size Equations for Comparing Two Groups with Continuous and Categorical Outcome Variables
Table 16.1 Calculation of Completeness and Correctness Using Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value
Table 19.1 Usability Methods Categorized by Type and Focus
Table 23.1 Specific Approaches Found Within a Decade of PPRNet Research
Table 23.2 Logic Model Disseminating Effective Strategies
to Improve Preventive Services Using HIT
Table 24.1 Typical Elements in a PHR (based on AHIMA, 2005)
Table 25.1 Success Criteria for the ECHONET Project,
Grouped Under Four Broad Evaluation Categories

Figures

Figure 2.1 IS success model.
Figure 2.2 Updated IS success model.
Figure 2.3 Infoway benefits evaluation (BE) framework.
Figure 3.1 IT interaction model.
Figure 3.2 Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.
Figure 3.3 Clinical adoption framework with its micro, meso and macro dimensions.
Figure 4.1 The clinical adoption meta-model.
Figure 4.2 Low adoption archetype.
Figure 4.3 Adoption without benefits archetype.
Figure 4.4 Behaviour change without outcome benefits archetype.
Figure 4.5 Benefit without use archetype.
Figure 4.6 Adoption with harm archetype.
Figure 5.1 eHealth economic evaluation framework.
Figure 7.1 A proposed holistic eHealth value framework for clinical adoption and meaningful use.
Figure 7.2 Summary of eHealth value findings from Canadian studies.
Figure 7.3 Summary of adoption factors assessed in micro, meso, and macro categories.
Figure 19.1 Usability and safety requirements often overlap and there is value in considering both.
Figure 19.2 STAMP applied to EMR systems.
Figure 19.3 An example of medication display following CUI design guidance.
Figure 20.1 Referral workflow.
Figure 20.2 General practice referral volumes by year (* 2010 data inflated by 6/5ths to estimate full year volume).
Figure 20.3 Median, first and third quartile (‘Med’, ‘1stQ’ and ‘3rdQ’ respectively) of letter-to-triage latency for e-referrals and paper referrals by year.
Figure 20.4 Sum of entries created or modified (over notes, care plan elements, messages and tasks) by role.
Figure 20.5 Elements viewed by user role based on number of NSCPP system audit log entries.
Figure 23.1 PPRNet-TRIP QI: A refined framework guiding primary care improvement.
Figure 24.1 A breakdown of the broad range of personal health services.
Figure 25.1 Clinically focused evaluation strategy.
Figure 25.2 Top-down taxonomy.
Figure 25.3 Telehealth connectivity for the case study project.
Figure 25.4 Components of the ECHONET project.

Preface

EPUB

Show the following:

Adjust appearance:

Notes

Annotate